The 3 main elements that run identity awareness under the hub are Active Directory Query (ADQ), PDP and PEP. The all intertwine to allow the different blades of the checkpoint to track and restrict access based on AD user and machine name.
PDP – The process on the Security Gateway responsible for collecting and sharing identities.
PEP – The process on the Security Gateway responsible for enforcing network access restrictions. Decisions are made according to identity data collected from the PDP.
AD Query – Is the module responsible for acquiring identities of entities (users or computers) from the Active Directory (AD).
PEP – The process on the Security Gateway responsible for enforcing network access restrictions. Decisions are made according to identity data collected from the PDP.
AD Query – Is the module responsible for acquiring identities of entities (users or computers) from the Active Directory (AD).
PDP and PEP
PDP uses PEP and ADLOG to gather security information about a person/system and stores it in the PDP database.
Checkpoint Identity Awareness
- PEP inspects packets looking at the IP address and checks in its own internal table to see if there was an existing association.
- If not it asks PDP if it knows about the packet.
- If not, then PDP asks ADLOG if there were any WMI events with this IP.
- If ADLOG has WMI events, the PDP asks the LDAP server if it has any more information about the user.
- If the user exists in AD, then this USER/IP/MACHINE are somewhat trusted under your AD environment.
If based on the source IP address the firewall is able to identity (not necessarily authenticate) a user associated with this address, the firewall will put the user into the PDP user table. Edain mod 4.0 download. At a minimum this association will be used to tag each log entry with the username.
Before a user is allowed to pass through firewall must:
1. Identity
2. Verify identity (authentication)
3. Groups belong to (authorization)
4. System user is currently using (IP address)
5. Permitted time period
4. Application
1. Identity
2. Verify identity (authentication)
3. Groups belong to (authorization)
4. System user is currently using (IP address)
5. Permitted time period
4. Application
There is no easy way to remove ALL user to IP address mappings. Need to use bash one-liner!
pep show user all | egrep -o ‘[0-9]{1,3}.[0-9]{1,3}.[0-9]{1,3}.[0-9]{1,3}’ | grep -v ‘127.0.0.1’ | xargs -i -p pdp revoke_ip {}
pep show user all | egrep -o ‘[0-9]{1,3}.[0-9]{1,3}.[0-9]{1,3}.[0-9]{1,3}’ | grep -v ‘127.0.0.1’ | xargs -i -p pdp revoke_ip {}
The outputs from the above cmds show a list of user-to-ip mappings of both firewall AUTHENICATED users and users just passing through minding their own business.
PDP will show all the users associated, be it Kerberos or ADquery.
When the reauth time times out it will be removed from PDP table.
PDP will show all the users associated, be it Kerberos or ADquery.
When the reauth time times out it will be removed from PDP table.
–IP: The computer the user is connected to
-Groups: AD groups relevant to fw access (not all groups)
-Roles: The smartdashboard access role
-Auth method: Type can be Kerberos, AD query, username password (portal)
-Next Reauthentication: When user will next need to reauth.
-Groups: AD groups relevant to fw access (not all groups)
-Roles: The smartdashboard access role
-Auth method: Type can be Kerberos, AD query, username password (portal)
-Next Reauthentication: When user will next need to reauth.
PEP is responsible for enforcement of the rulebase which allows/ permits AD users and AD machines (not IP addresses) through a firewall. So just like PDP, PEP keeps a table/ cache of IP/ Users that it has seen pass through the firewall.
Active Directory Query (ADQ) and SSO (Kerberos)
Keeps track of users by reading the Active Directory Event logs. Therefore it will see if a user logins into a laptop, uses MS services like mounting a file share, RDPs to a server or uses an Internet browser.
It does not see log out events, to track this it relies on:
-The user / IP association (default 720mins)
-Assume that only 1 user is connected per comp (disabled by default)
-The user / IP association (default 720mins)
-Assume that only 1 user is connected per comp (disabled by default)
The 4 AD events tracked by ADQ are:
4624: Local login
4768: Kerberos ticket was requested from DC. This identifies the user/machine in Kerberos
4769: Kerberos Service Ticket was requested: User/machine requires access to resource like file system mapping or web server
4770: Kerberos Service was renewed: Kerberos will auto renew service ticket if user still logged in
4624: Local login
4768: Kerberos ticket was requested from DC. This identifies the user/machine in Kerberos
4769: Kerberos Service Ticket was requested: User/machine requires access to resource like file system mapping or web server
4770: Kerberos Service was renewed: Kerberos will auto renew service ticket if user still logged in
ADLOG is like an external cache of WMI events for AD. Because an IP is in this cache doesn’t mean the firewall cares or uses the IP addresses. With no Access roles configured within checkpoint this will be just a list of users, machines and the associations.
The cache is there so that PDP and PEP can refer to the IP list in the future when needed.
In a HA gateway setup the ADLOG tables are not replicated to the standby member, however the PDP/PEP tables are.
In a HA gateway setup the ADLOG tables are not replicated to the standby member, however the PDP/PEP tables are.
“Identity Source: AD Query” in checkpoint logs is the ADQ (WMI events)
You don’t NEED ADQ enabled if you plan on using Captive Portal or SSO to authenticate users. However, the logs might be somewhat barren of user-to-IP address mappings without it.
If ADQ and SSO are both enabled, ADQ is only one that is updated in PDP table and used by Identity awareness. Therefore if using them both, SSO Identity awareness will only used (added to pdp database) when it is a non-corporate machine (not in AD).
With SSO when a user logs out and a different user logs in on the same computer (IP) the PEP or PDP table are not updated until the old users PDP entry times out. The default for this timer is 720 minutes but can be reduced to 5 minutes. As soon as this expires the new user is added to the PDP database.
“Identity Source: Captive Portal” in logs are captive portal or SSO (not WMI)
Caveats
“Run as” will generate a new log so update the ADLOG, however when original user attempts another action it will still be seen as the “run as” user until an action is done to generate a new AD event (for example lock screen). With SSO it doesn’t even register the “run as” as a new user.
If you need to use a proxy or load balancer that hides the true source IP you can add the XFF header and Identity Awareness will recognise this. However the checkpoint can only identify IPs from the XFF header, if you all add anything else such as usernames the checkpoint will ignore these.
XFF only works for HTTP traffic, with HTTPS traffic even if you are using HTTPS inspection on the checkpoint so it can decrypt the packet, the checkpoint cant read the XFF header. I feel this is a major flaw, I had cases open with checkpoint about this and in the end they said it is expected behaviour and the only thing I could do is put in a feature request. The XFF header is there, the checkpoint is already decrypting the packet, so why not allow it to read it. With the amount of sites now being HTTPS think is very shortsighted by checkpoint.
Advertisements
Reading Time: 3minutesI keep telling myself that the kids and I don’t need any more amiibo. And I manage to stick to my guns… for a time. Skyrim jarl of ivarstead wild. Inevitably, Nintendo rolls out something I can’t resist (I’m looking at you, Squid Sisters) or we find a deal too good pass up (like those fire sale Animal Crossing amiibo on Amazon), and we end up with more of these interactive figurines crowded around our entertainment center.
I’ve seen lots of really great amiibo display products, from tiered organizers to wall units, but the ones that hit the sweet spot between form and function for yours truly are from peripheral manufacturer PDP. Its Super Mario Pipe stands were a big hit in my house last Christmas, and its more recent releases manage to outstrip even the simple elegance of that product.
Like the aforementioned Warp Pipe, PDP’s Spinning Fire Bar display draws inspiration from the classic Super Mario Bros. and lets you easily elevate your favorite figures above the fray. The trick this time, in addition to its delightfully lo-res brick and lava motif, is a wind-up motorized bar of pixelated fireballs. Admittedly, the wind-up mechanism is almost comically loud, but it’s fun and it works and it’s the perfect accessory for the retro gamer and amiibo collector in your life.
For those whose tastes skew a bit more toward epic fantasy, PDP’s Master Sword display is another handsome addition that hides a couple of unique surprises. Simply pop Link (or any other amiibo that strikes your fancy) into the stand to give it a place of prominence in your collection. But wait; is that a removable Master Sword?! Yes. Yes it is. It is also a stylus, perfect for use with your Wii U or 3DS. And—assuming you drop a couple of AAA batteries into it—removing/reinserting the sword into the stand itself will also trigger some series-appropriate sound effects.
For those looking for a themed set piece to house multiple amiibo, your choice was pretty much limited to POWER A’s End Level display, a fun (if bulky) reproduction of the Super Mario final checkpoint flag. PDP, however, elected to crown its new line with its own Donkey Kong display. Aping (see what I did there?) the classic ladder and girder motif, this allows for the storage and display of nine amiibo (as opposed to POWER A’s six) and looks fabulous.
Admittedly, it did take me a few tries to parse its foldout black-and-white instruction sheet—I am not so good with the spatial relations—but once I got it assembled I was pleasantly surprised by its sturdiness. While this one doesn’t sport any sound effects or mechanization, something about its crazy fuschia and sea foam color scheme and wonky 8-bit slant has made it a real conversation piece.
Not content to just make your amiibo collection more awesome, PDP has also released a new hybrid storage case for the New Nintendo 3DS XL. The Slim Storage Armor is really just a variation on the existing Zelda Clip Armor but, like, with storage.
The bottom of this translucent green shell snaps flush to your 3DS, while the top adds a raised hinged door that can be lifted to reveal storage space for three game cartridges, two styli, and, for some reason, a microfiber cleaning charm. Why you would keep your cleaning charm in there instead of simply looping it through the wrist strap hole on your New 3DS XL is a mystery to me, but I’m not here to judge.
![Examples of a pdp Examples of a pdp](/uploads/1/2/3/7/123714263/445494330.jpg)
Like PDP’s aforementioned Clip Armor, this is also decorated with a little LOZ Download naruto ultimate ninja storm 2 pc. flash; Toon Link launches a spin attack on the top graphic, and the included charm is also festooned in Hylian splendor.
Despite adding some necessary bulk to the top, the Slim Storage Armor more or less lives up to its name. It is indeed slim and it does offer ample storage, but this accessory is not without its quirks.
First and foremost, the door to its storage compartment is a little tough for an adult (and nigh impossible for some younger gamers) to open via traditional means. My suggestion is to forgo that enticing front indentation and instead focus your attack on one of the sides. Trust me; it’s far easier.
Secondly, the cartridge slots therein are also a tight fit, though they do loosen up a bit after some use. Also, I’ll point out that the camera cutouts (though, honestly, they’re more akin to camera tunnels) could conceivably cause some shadowing when taking pictures with your 3DS. Although, I can’t imagine photography is at the forefront of the mind of an average 3DS gamer.
At $14.99, I’d still call the Slim Storage Armor a solid purchase. I am, after all, an avid 3DS accessorizer, and this one does add some nice functionality. The Spinning Fire and Master Sword amiibo displays are similarly priced, and they do look quite fetching, but it’s the Donkey Kong display that really wowed me. Coming in at only $5 more($19.99), it’s a must-buy that manages to impress above and beyond PDP’s other remarkable accessories.
Review materials provided by: PDP
Advertisements
Related
Look up PDP in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
PDP may refer to:
Computing and technology[edit]
- Packet Data Protocol in wireless GPRS/HSDPA networks
- Parallel distributed processing in Connectionism
- Plasma display panel, a type of flat panel display
- Policy Decision Point in the Common Open Policy Service
- Power-delay product, the product of power consumption times the input–output delay
- Power delay profile, signal intensity as a function of time delay
- Primary Data Point in the RRDtool
- Programmed Data Processor, a series of minicomputers made by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC)
- PDP-1, the first DEC PDP, 1959
- PDP-6, 1963
- PDP-10, mainframe computer 1966-1980s
- PDP-11, series of 16-bit minicomputers
- Project Detail Page, a view of schedule information on Microsoft Project Server
- XACML PDP, a XACML policy decision point that issues XACML responses
Politics[edit]
- Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party, a political party in Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir
- Democratic Renewal Party (Indonesia), or Partai Demokrasi Pembaruan in Indonesian
- Islamic Party (Egypt), formerly the Peace and Development Party, Egypt
- Party for Democratic Prosperity, Republic of Macedonia
- Peace and Development Party, Mogadishu, Somalia
- People's Democratic Party (disambiguation), any of a number of worldwide political parties
- Popular Democratic Party (disambiguation), any of a number of worldwide political parties
- Progressive Democratic Party (disambiguation), a number of worldwide political parties
- Papua Presidium Council, a West Papuan political organization
- Party of Democratic Progress, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Other[edit]
- IATA code for Capitán de Corbeta Carlos A. Curbelo International Airport, near Punta del Este, Uruguay
- Pacific Drums and Percussion, a percussion instrument manufacturer
- Perfect Dream Project, idol group from the Love Live! franchise
- Plastic Disclosure Project, to reduce the environmental impact of plastic
- Pi Delta Psi fraternity, Binghamton University
- Prescription Drug Plan in US Medicare
- Personal Data Protection
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PDP&oldid=894847949'
In 2018 Check Point added a green wall to its headquarters in Tel Aviv.[1][2] | |
Public | |
Traded as | NASDAQ: CHKP NASDAQ-100 Component |
---|---|
Industry | Security software Computer hardware |
Founded | Ramat Gan, Israel (1993; 26 years ago) |
Founders | Gil Shwed Marius Nacht Shlomo Kramer |
Headquarters | 959 Skyway Rd, San Carlos, California, United States 5 Shlomo Kaplan Street, Tel Aviv, Israel[3] |
Key people | Gil Shwed, (Founder & CEO) |
Products | FireWall-1, VPN-1, UTM-1, Check Point Integrity, Intrusion prevention systems, Endpoint, security, Security appliances, Web Application Security |
Revenue | US$ 191.6 crores(2018)[4] |
US$ 852 million (2016)[4] | |
US$ 725 million (2016)[4] | |
5,000 (2019)[5] | |
Subsidiaries | ZoneAlarm, SofaWare, Easy2comply |
Website | www.checkpoint.com |
Check Point is a multinational provider of software and combined hardware and software products for IT security, including network security, endpoint security, cloud security, mobile security, data security and security management.
As of 2019 the company has approximately 5,000 employees worldwide.[6] Headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel and San Carlos, California, the company has development centers in Israel, United States (ZoneAlarm), Sweden (Former Protect Data development centre), and Belarus. The company has main offices in North America, two in the United States (San Carlos, California and Dallas, Texas) and Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
History[edit]
Check Point was established in Ramat-Gan, Israel in 1993, by Gil Shwed (CEO as of 2016), Marius Nacht (Chairman as of 2016) and Shlomo Kramer (who left Check Point in 2003).[7] Shwed had the initial idea for the company's core technology known as stateful inspection, which became the foundation for the company's first product, FireWall-1; soon afterwards they also developed one of the world's first VPN products, VPN-1.[8] Shwed developed the idea while serving in the Unit 8200 of the Israel Defense Forces, where he worked on securing classified networks.[9][10]
Initial funding of US$400,000 was provided by venture capital fund BRM Group.[11]
In 1994 Check Point signed an OEM agreement with Sun Microsystems,[8] followed by a distribution agreement with HP in 1995.[12] The same year, the U.S. head office was established in Redwood City, California.
By February 1996 the company was named worldwide firewall market leader by IDC, with a market share of 40 percent.[13]In June 1996 Check Point raised $67 million from its initial public offering on NASDAQ.[14]
In 1998 Check Point established a partnership with Nokia, which bundled Check Point's Software with Nokia's computer Network Security Appliances.[14]
In 2003, a class action lawsuit was filed against Check Point over violation of the Securities Exchange Act by failing to disclose major financial information.[15]
During the first decade of the 21st century Check Point started acquiring other IT security companies, including Nokia's network security business unit in 2009.[16]
In 2019, researchers at Check Point found a security breach in Xiaomi phone apps.[17] The security flaw was reported preinstalled.[18]
Check Point is presently focused on what it calls 'fifth generation cyber security,' or “Gen V.” It identifies the fifth generation as focused on large-scale and fast moving attacks across mobile, cloud and on-premise networks that easily bypass the conventional, static detection-based defenses being used by most organizations today.[19][20][21][22][23]
Over the years many employees who worked at Check Point have left to start their own software companies. These include Shlomo Kremer, who started Imperva; Nir Zuk, who founded Palo Alto Networks; Ruvi Kitov and Reuven Harrison of Tufin; and Yonadav Leitersdorf, who founded Indeni.
Products[edit]
Check Point offers the following primary products:
- Network Security
- Software Defined Protection
- Public and Private Cloud Security
- Data Security
- ThreatCloud
- ThreatCloud IntelliStore
- Virtual Systems
- Endpoint Security
- Mobile Security
- Security Management
- Document Security (Capsule Docs product line)[24]
- Zero-day Protection (SandBlast appliance product line)[25]
- Mobile Security (Mobile Threat Prevention product line)[26]
Acquisitions[edit]
Check Point offices, Tel Aviv
- Zone Labs, makers of the ZoneAlarm personal firewall software, in 2003, for $205 million in cash and shares.[27]
- Protect Data, the holding company for PointSec Mobile Technologies, in a cash deal valued at $586m in late 2006.[28] Prior to their acquisition by Check Point, Protect Data acquired Reflex Software.[29]
- NFR security, an intrusion prevention system developer, for $20 million in late 2006, following its failed plan to acquire the larger IPS vendor Sourcefire.[30]
- Nokia Security Appliances division was acquired in April 2009.[16]
- Liquid Machines, a data security startup company based in Boston, was acquired in June 2010.[31]
- Dynasec, a provider of enterprise governance, risk management, and compliance products, was acquired in November 2011. Dynasec offers a Web-based enterprise application, branded as Easy2comply, for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, Basel II compliance, operational risk management, information security management, HIPAA compliance, and internal audit management.[32]
- Hyperwise, an early-stage startup, focused on CPU Level Threat Prevention was acquired Feb 2015.[33]
- Lacoon Mobile Security was acquired in April 2015.[34]
- Dome9 was acquired in October 2018.[35]
- ForceNock was acquired in January 2019.
In 2005, Check Point tried to acquire intrusion prevention system developers Sourcefire for $225 million,[36] but later withdrew its offer after it became clear US authorities (specifically, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States) would try to block the acquisition.[37]
SofaWare legal battle[edit]
SofaWare Technologies was founded in 1999, as a cooperation between Check Point and SofaWare's founders, Adi Ruppin and Etay Bogner, with the purpose of extending Check Point from the enterprise market to the small business, consumer and branch office market. SofaWare's co-founder Adi Ruppin said that his company wanted to make the technology simple to use and affordable, and to lift the burden of security management from end users while adding some features.[38] In 2001 SofaWare began selling firewall appliances under the SofaWare S-Box brand;[39] in 2002 the company started selling the Safe@Office and Safe@Home line of security appliances, under the Check Point brand.[38] By the fourth quarter of 2002 sales of SofaWare's Safe@Office firewall/VPN appliances had increased greatly, and SofaWare held the #1 revenue position in the worldwide firewall/VPN sub-$490 appliance market, with a 38% revenue market share.[40]
Relations between Check Point and the SofaWare founders went sour after the company acquisition in 2002. In 2004 Etay Bogner, co-founder of SofaWare, sought court approval to file a shareholderderivative suit, claiming Check Point was not transferring funds to SofaWare as required for its use of SofaWare's products and technology. His derivative suit was ultimately successful, and Check Point was ordered to pay SofaWare 13 million shekels for breach of contract.In 2006 the Tel Aviv District Court Judge ruled that Bogner SofaWare could sue Check Point by proxy for $5.1 million in alleged damage to SofaWare.[41] Bogner claimed that Check Point, which owned 60% of Sofaware, had behaved belligerently, and withheld monies due for use of SofaWare technology and products[41] Check Point appealed the ruling, but lost.[42]
In 2009 the Israeli Supreme Court ruled that a group of founders of SofaWare, which includes Bogner, had veto power over any decision of SofaWare. The court ruled that the three founders could exercise their veto power only as a group and by majority rule.
In 2011 Check Point settled all litigation relating to SofaWare. As part of the settlement it acquired the SofaWare shares held by Bogner and Ruppin, and began a process of acquiring the remaining shares, resulting in SofaWare becoming a wholly owned subsidiary.[43]
See also[edit]
What Is A Checkpoint Inhibitor
References[edit]
What Is Pdp In Retail
- ^https://xnet.ynet.co.il/architecture/articles/0,14710,L-3108494,00.html
- ^https://www.haaretz.co.il/gallery/architecture/.premium-MAGAZINE-1.4427178
- ^Check Point (7 May 2019). 'Contact Us'. Retrieved 7 May 2019.
- ^ abc'FY 2016'.
- ^'Check Point Software Facts @ A Glance'. Retrieved 2014-06-24.
- ^Check Point Facts at a Glance https://www.checkpoint.com/about-us/facts-a-glance/
- ^'Bloomberg Profile: Checkpoint Software Technologies Ltd.', Bloomberg
- ^ abMayor, Tracy (October 1, 2002), 'CIO 20/20 Honorees—Innovator's Profile: Gil Schwed of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd', CIO Magazine
- ^Savage, Marcia. Gil Shwed, Chairman & CEO, Check Point Software Tech. CRN, Nov. 07, 2001.
- ^, Oct 1, 2002
- ^Wallace, David (December 1, 1999), 'MOVERS & SHAKERS: Eli Barkat: Making Push More Polite – and Ready for Prime Time', Business Week, retrieved 2009-11-09
- ^Company Press Release (September 25, 1995), 'CheckPoint Software and HP sign distribution agreement; market-leading FireWall-1 solution now available through HP and its reseller channel.', Business Wire
- ^Press Release (February 5, 1996), 'CheckPoint Software Named Firewall Market Share Leader by IDC; Worldwide Market Share of 40 Percent Represents Significant Lead in Providing Enterprise Network Security Solutions.', Business Wire, archived from the original on October 11, 2012
- ^ abBreznitz, Dan (2007), 'Industrial R&D as a national policy: Horizontal technology policies and industry-state co-evolution in the growth of the Israeli software industry', Research Policy, 36 (9): 1465–1482, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.06.006
- ^'Notice of Filing of Class Action Lawsuit Against Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., Gil Shwed, Jerry Ungerman, Eyal Desheh, Irwin Federman and Alex Vieux – CHKP'. October 13, 2003. Retrieved Jul 25, 2013.
- ^ ab'Check Point Completes Acquisition of Nokia Security Appliance Business'. 2009-04-13. Archived from the original on 2009-04-16. Retrieved 2009-04-13.
- ^https://www.timesofisrael.com/check-point-researchers-find-security-breach-in-xiaomi-phone-app/
- ^https://www.cnet.com/news/xiaomis-phones-had-a-security-flaw-preinstalled-on-millions-of-devices/
- ^'Check Point Software Technologies announces new Smart-1 appliances to power 'Gen V' security management | telecomkh'. www.telecomkh.com. January 26, 2018. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
- ^Shacklett, Mary (April 3, 2018). '10 ways to develop cybersecurity policies and best practices'. ZDnet.
- ^SOLOMON, SHOSHANNA (30 January 2018). ''Winter' of cyber-threats is coming, experts warn'. The Times of Israel. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
- ^Riley, Duncan (12 April 2018). 'Nearly all organizations are unprepared for next-gen cybersecurity threats'. Silicon Angle. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
- ^Marshall, David. 'Check Point Defines Five Generations of CyberAttacks, Mobile vs. Cloud Attacks, and Detection and Prevention'. Virtualization Technology News and Information (Friday, March 30, 2018). Retrieved 9 May 2018.
- ^Check Point. 'Capsule Docs'. Check Point. Retrieved 18 November 2016.
- ^'SandBlast Zero-Day Protection'. Check Point .com. Retrieved 2017-04-23.
- ^'Mobile Threat Prevention'. Check Point. April 2, 2015. Retrieved 2017-04-23.
- ^'Check Point Software Technologies to Acquire Zone Labs'. 2003-12-15. Archived from the original on 2008-05-15. Retrieved 2008-10-12.
- ^'Check Point Announces a Cash Tender Offer to Acquire Protect Data'. 2006-11-20. Archived from the original on 2008-12-28. Retrieved 2008-10-12.
- ^'Protect Data acquires Reflex Software Limited to extend product portfolio'. 2006-11-02. Archived from the original on 2008-12-03. Retrieved 2008-10-12.
- ^'Check Point to Acquire NFR Security; Expands Intrusion Prevention Capabilities to Fortify Enterprise Networks'. 2006-12-19. Archived from the original on 2008-05-16. Retrieved 2008-10-12.
- ^Check Point Acquires Data Security Startup Liquid Machines
- ^'Check Point acquires Israel's Dynasec to boost GRC offerings'. Infosecurity. 1 November 2011.
- ^Check Point Acquires Hyperwise to Deliver Industry's First CPU Level Threat Prevention Capabilities
- ^Check Point to Acquire Lacoon Mobile Security for Industry's Most Advanced Mobile Threat Prevention
- ^Habib-Valdhorn, Shiri (October 24, 2018). 'Check Point beats analysts, buys cloud security co'. Globes. Retrieved October 24, 2018.
- ^'Check Point and Sourcefire to Explore Alternative Business Relationship'. 2006-03-23. Archived from the original on 2008-10-02. Retrieved 2008-10-12.
- ^'Check Point calls off Sourcefire buy'. 2006-03-24. Retrieved 2008-10-13.
- ^ abInterview with Adi Ruppin, Founder and Managing Director of SofaWare, by Berislav Kucan — Tuesday, 21 January 2003.
- ^Check Point bolsters new firewall appliance. Network World Dec 17, 2001. p. 15, 18
- ^Check Point Software Stakes Claim in Small Business Internet Security SpaceCompany Duplicates Market-leading Enterprise Success in Sub-$490 Appliance Segment 'Archived copy'. Archived from the original on 2013-01-16. Retrieved 2016-07-27.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
- ^ abArbel, Oded (April 25, 2006). 'Sofaware founder cleared to sue Check Point for $5.1 million'. Ha'aretz. Retrieved 14 June 2010.
- ^Israeli Supreme Court, עא 2850/08 CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD נ' איתי בוגנר (עליון, א' רובינשטיין, ח' מלצר, נ' הנדל)
- ^Check Point 20-F SEC filing. 2011
External links[edit]
- Business data for Check Point:
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Check_Point&oldid=902532062'